vat digital light processing (dlp) printer pro 55 (SprintRay Inc)
90
Structured Review
SprintRay Inc
vat digital light processing (dlp) printer pro 55
Vat Digital Light Processing (Dlp) Printer Pro 55, supplied by SprintRay Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vat+digital+light+processing+(dlp)+printer+pro+55/digital+light+processing+3d+printer/pm39859736-87-16-24
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Vat Digital Light Processing (Dlp) Printer Pro 55, supplied by SprintRay Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/vat+digital+light+processing+(dlp)+printer+pro+55/digital+light+processing+3d+printer/pm39859736-87-16-24
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vat digital light processing (dlp) printer pro 55 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Polymer:Article Title: Characterization of materials used for 3D printing dental crowns and hybrid prostheses. Article Snippet: Correspondence Nathaniel C. Lawson, Division of Biomaterials, UAB School of Dentistry, 1919 7 Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.. Email: nlawson@uab.edu Abstract Objectives: To compare the filler weight percentage (wt%), filler and resin composition, flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of several 3D-printed resins to direct and indirect restorative materials.. Materials and Methods: Four 3D-printed resins (C&B MFH, Ceramic Crown, OnX, and OnX Tough), one milled resin composite (Lava Ultimate), one conventional composite (Filtek Supreme), and one ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) were evaluated. Article Title: Effect of Air Particle Abrasion and Primers on Bond Strength to 3D-Printed Crown Materials. Article Snippet: The discs were 3D-printed using the two 3D-printed resin composites listed in Table 1 in a Article Title: Mechanical Properties of Additive-Manufactured Composite-Based Resins for Permanent Indirect Restorations: A Scoping Review Article Snippet: Bora et al., 2023 [ ] , Additive manufactured: 1. C&B MFH 2. Ceramic crown 3. OnX 4. OnX Tough Reference materials: 5. Lava Ultimate (A milled composite resin) 6. Filtek Supreme (A conventional composite) 7. IPS e.max CAD (A ceramic) A total of n = 70 was measured. For each material group n = 10. , 1. NextDent 2. SprintRay 3. SprintRay 4. SprintRay 5. 3M 6. 3M 7. Ivoclar AG , 1. 3D-printed resin for provisional crowns 2. 3D-printed resin for permanent crowns 3 and 4. 3D-printed resin for provisional hybrid dentures 5. Milled resin-composite for permanent crowns 6. Light-cured resin composite for direct fillings 7. Milled ceramic for permanent crowns , All 3D-printed resin materials were printed in a vat digital light processing (DLP) printer (Pro 55, SprintRay, Los Angeles, CA, USA). , The specimens were positioned on the build platform such that the long axis of the bar was oriented parallel to the build platform (parallel with the horizon) and printed with a 100 μm layer thickness. Specimens were cleaned using 91% Comparison:Article Title: Characterization of materials used for 3D printing dental crowns and hybrid prostheses. Article Snippet: Correspondence Nathaniel C. Lawson, Division of Biomaterials, UAB School of Dentistry, 1919 7 Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.. Email: nlawson@uab.edu Abstract Objectives: To compare the filler weight percentage (wt%), filler and resin composition, flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of several 3D-printed resins to direct and indirect restorative materials.. Materials and Methods: Four 3D-printed resins (C&B MFH, Ceramic Crown, OnX, and OnX Tough), one milled resin composite (Lava Ultimate), one conventional composite (Filtek Supreme), and one ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) were evaluated. Article Title: Effect of Air Particle Abrasion and Primers on Bond Strength to 3D-Printed Crown Materials. Article Snippet: The discs were 3D-printed using the two 3D-printed resin composites listed in Table 1 in a Article Title: Mechanical Properties of Additive-Manufactured Composite-Based Resins for Permanent Indirect Restorations: A Scoping Review Article Snippet: Bora et al., 2023 [ ] , Additive manufactured: 1. C&B MFH 2. Ceramic crown 3. OnX 4. OnX Tough Reference materials: 5. Lava Ultimate (A milled composite resin) 6. Filtek Supreme (A conventional composite) 7. IPS e.max CAD (A ceramic) A total of n = 70 was measured. For each material group n = 10. , 1. NextDent 2. SprintRay 3. SprintRay 4. SprintRay 5. 3M 6. 3M 7. Ivoclar AG , 1. 3D-printed resin for provisional crowns 2. 3D-printed resin for permanent crowns 3 and 4. 3D-printed resin for provisional hybrid dentures 5. Milled resin-composite for permanent crowns 6. Light-cured resin composite for direct fillings 7. Milled ceramic for permanent crowns , All 3D-printed resin materials were printed in a vat digital light processing (DLP) printer (Pro 55, SprintRay, Los Angeles, CA, USA). , The specimens were positioned on the build platform such that the long axis of the bar was oriented parallel to the build platform (parallel with the horizon) and printed with a 100 μm layer thickness. Specimens were cleaned using 91% Control:Article Title: Characterization of materials used for 3D printing dental crowns and hybrid prostheses. Article Snippet: Correspondence Nathaniel C. Lawson, Division of Biomaterials, UAB School of Dentistry, 1919 7 Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.. Email: nlawson@uab.edu Abstract Objectives: To compare the filler weight percentage (wt%), filler and resin composition, flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of several 3D-printed resins to direct and indirect restorative materials.. Materials and Methods: Four 3D-printed resins (C&B MFH, Ceramic Crown, OnX, and OnX Tough), one milled resin composite (Lava Ultimate), one conventional composite (Filtek Supreme), and one ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) were evaluated. Article Title: Effect of Air Particle Abrasion and Primers on Bond Strength to 3D-Printed Crown Materials. Article Snippet: The discs were 3D-printed using the two 3D-printed resin composites listed in Table 1 in a Article Title: Mechanical Properties of Additive-Manufactured Composite-Based Resins for Permanent Indirect Restorations: A Scoping Review Article Snippet: Bora et al., 2023 [ ] , Additive manufactured: 1. C&B MFH 2. Ceramic crown 3. OnX 4. OnX Tough Reference materials: 5. Lava Ultimate (A milled composite resin) 6. Filtek Supreme (A conventional composite) 7. IPS e.max CAD (A ceramic) A total of n = 70 was measured. For each material group n = 10. , 1. NextDent 2. SprintRay 3. SprintRay 4. SprintRay 5. 3M 6. 3M 7. Ivoclar AG , 1. 3D-printed resin for provisional crowns 2. 3D-printed resin for permanent crowns 3 and 4. 3D-printed resin for provisional hybrid dentures 5. Milled resin-composite for permanent crowns 6. Light-cured resin composite for direct fillings 7. Milled ceramic for permanent crowns , All 3D-printed resin materials were printed in a vat digital light processing (DLP) printer (Pro 55, SprintRay, Los Angeles, CA, USA). , The specimens were positioned on the build platform such that the long axis of the bar was oriented parallel to the build platform (parallel with the horizon) and printed with a 100 μm layer thickness. Specimens were cleaned using 91% |